Runboard.com
Слава Україні!
Community logo


runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 

 
MachineHead 1 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Talker of Total Bollocks

Registered: 09-2005
Posts: 1340
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


quote:

Ormandy wrote:

To be honest, the moment I bought TBRO in 1993, in the garbage can went S&M.


A neighbour of mine (he was brought up on In Rock which he bought within days of its first release) - he did the very same with Stormbringer, he just didn't see it as Purple at all and in the bin it went - in a number of pieces so he told me - one helluva excuse for not being able to oblige/lend an album if ever there was one! emoticon



---
From the moment I heard the opening strains of Highway Star... that was it!!!
Machine Head blew me away
In Rock blew my brains out

15/8/2006, 16:25 Link to this post   Blog
 
Atle Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 6053
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


quote:

Randys wrote:

1 Do you consider Mark V worthy to carry the name Deep Purple???

2 Do you think SLAVES AND MASTERS should be included in Purple discography???

3 Do you think Mark V should be erased in Purple history???



1 Yes!

2 Of course!

3 No, why? On the opposite, I think S&M shows another sode of Deep Purple - on possible with Blackmore, Lord, Glover and Paice, but not with Ian Gillan. I find that interesting - and I like the album too. If not innovative, typical DP, an all time high - I like it anyway. Another purple colour, and I like them all!

---
"...though the reason now is gone,
the battle rages on"
15/8/2006, 16:42 Link to this post Send Email to Atle   Send PM to Atle Blog
 
MachineHead 1 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Talker of Total Bollocks

Registered: 09-2005
Posts: 1340
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


quote:

Atle wrote:

quote:

Randys wrote:

1 Do you consider Mark V worthy to carry the name Deep Purple???

2 Do you think SLAVES AND MASTERS should be included in Purple discography???

3 Do you think Mark V should be erased in Purple history???



1 Yes!

2 Of course!

3 No, why? On the opposite, I think S&M shows another sode of Deep Purple - on possible with Blackmore, Lord, Glover and Paice, but not with Ian Gillan. I find that interesting - and I like the album too. If not innovative, typical DP, an all time high - I like it anyway. Another purple colour, and I like them all!


I can see I'm gonna have to give S & M another listen



---
From the moment I heard the opening strains of Highway Star... that was it!!!
Machine Head blew me away
In Rock blew my brains out

15/8/2006, 17:18 Link to this post   Blog
 
purpletemple Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 8972
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


Not really. Satriani has never been part of dP, but more a temporary replacement.
This said, his job with dP was amazing and I'd love that someone would officialy release a live album.

I think that a proper mark should be considered only when a proper release (live or studio) has been made.

No offence to Satriani.

---
"Did you know you have hairs up your nostrils?"
15/8/2006, 18:52 Link to this post Send Email to purpletemple   Send PM to purpletemple
 
Alerikson Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 02-2006
Posts: 706
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


quote:

purpletemple wrote:

Not really. Satriani has never been part of dP, but more a temporary replacement.
This said, his job with dP was amazing and I'd love that someone would officialy release a live album.

I think that a proper mark should be considered only when a proper release (live or studio) has been made.

No offence to Satriani.



I think you refer to mkVI. MkV was Blackmore - Lord - Glover - Paice - Turner


---
"...and my name is Keith Emerson"
15/8/2006, 19:45 Link to this post Send Email to Alerikson   Send PM to Alerikson
 
paintedhorse Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 08-2005
Posts: 212
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


I'm pretty much with those who've made the "4/5 th's" argument here. It's the quality of S&M (certainly not all JLT's fault) as an album, & Mk 5's poor live performances (mostly JLT's fault), that really count against Mk 5. If s&m HAD BEEN A BETTER ALBUM, & Mk 5, performed better live, we wouldn't even be having this debate.
15/8/2006, 20:07 Link to this post Send Email to paintedhorse   Send PM to paintedhorse
 
Rahul Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 6181
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


Yeah, MKV is Deep Purple.

After all, what's a rock n roll story without any low points?

---
I climbed on the back of a giant albatross
What flew through a crack in the cloud
To a place where happiness reigned all year round
Where music played ever so loudly

15/8/2006, 21:07 Link to this post Send Email to Rahul   Send PM to Rahul
 
Beese Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info



Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 2365
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


It's DP, that's the name they went by and the band contained 4/5 of Mk2 and 3 original members.

It's also quite a Rainbow album at the same time. Blackmore, Glover and Turner are the principal writers and that was exactly the same as JLT era Rainbow.
16/8/2006, 1:38 Link to this post Send Email to Beese   Send PM to Beese
 
MrEd45 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Admin

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 9983
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???



Q: Do you consider Mark V worthy to carry the name Deep Purple???

A: Maybe not at 100% worthiness, but that's just my view, which is highly subjective. From as close to a 100% objective view as I can get - of course they were.

 
Q: Do you think SLAVES AND MASTERS should be included in Purple discography???

A: Yes

Q: Do you think Mark V should be erased in Purple history???

A: No


---
" Those who can - do. Those who can't do - teach. Those who can't do or teach - administrate."
- Anon.

" One that will not reason is a bigot. One that cannot reason is an ignoramus. One that dares not reason is a slave." - Anon
16/8/2006, 2:17 Link to this post Send Email to MrEd45   Send PM to MrEd45 Blog
 
purpletemple Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 8972
Reply | Quote
Re: Do you consider Mark V as Purple???


quote:

Alerikson wrote:

quote:

purpletemple wrote:

Not really. Satriani has never been part of dP, but more a temporary replacement.
This said, his job with dP was amazing and I'd love that someone would officialy release a live album.

I think that a proper mark should be considered only when a proper release (live or studio) has been made.

No offence to Satriani.



I think you refer to mkVI. MkV was Blackmore - Lord - Glover - Paice - Turner



Ooooops! My mistake!
Then yes, and according to what I said about the studio recording , I consider Mark V a dP incarnation.



---
"Did you know you have hairs up your nostrils?"
16/8/2006, 6:57 Link to this post Send Email to purpletemple   Send PM to purpletemple
 


Reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 





You are not logged in (login)