doggone
Purple fan
Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 2294
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Beatles or Stones
Which group do you like better when it comes to the music they made in the 1960's, the Beatles or Stones with Brian Jones. I always liked the Stones music better. I think their music had a harder edge and Mick did some great vocals. Both bands are great though!
|
|
2/11/2019, 16:36
|
Link to this post
Send Email to doggone
Send PM to doggone
|
Concrete god
Purple fan
Registered: 03-2013
Posts: 2461
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Beatles or Stones
Like both Bands. But Stones have the edge. Have seen Stones live but only one 1/4 of The Beatles. George Harrison with our beloved Purps. Stones is more rock for me.
---
ConcreteGod
|
|
3/11/2019, 9:18
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Concrete god
Send PM to Concrete god
Blog
|
fdr
Purple fan
Registered: 08-2011
Posts: 1894
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Beatles or Stones
I'd say The Who.
Forced to choose between the two: Beatles because they are not as rock as the Stones but visionaries. The Who were both. I like that.
|
|
3/11/2019, 10:50
|
Link to this post
Send Email to fdr
Send PM to fdr
Blog
|
Kinski
Purple fan
Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 490
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Beatles or Stones
Not a huge fan of either, but the Beatles are my choice. They are heavily responsible for the evolution of rock music and one of first bands to show that rock was a credible form of music with the release of RUBBER SOUL.
Both bands leave much to be desired though when it comes to musicianship. The fist band that arrived on the scene that truly matters to me is Cream.
|
|
4/11/2019, 19:40
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Kinski
Send PM to Kinski
|
paice30
Purple fan
Registered: 07-2005
Posts: 734
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Beatles or Stones
Between the two, The Beatles.
But IMO,The Kinks >>> all other British Invasion bands.
|
|
17/11/2019, 21:20
|
Link to this post
Send Email to paice30
Send PM to paice30
|
Witchy Nightmare
Purple fan
Registered: 03-2005
Posts: 3396
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re:
As most of those comparisons, it's not so simple as the question suggests. Songwriting wise and in the studio, the Beatles were far superior to the Stones for me, but in terms of live performances, the Stones were.
|
|
17/11/2019, 21:42
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Witchy Nightmare
Send PM to Witchy Nightmare
|
leelyt
Purple fan
Registered: 04-2017
Posts: 795
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re:
Beatles.
|
|
18/11/2019, 8:36
|
Link to this post
Send Email to leelyt
Send PM to leelyt
Blog
|
Randys
Purple fan
Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 3886
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Beatles or Stones
Of course the Beatles...
|
|
18/11/2019, 8:37
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Randys
Send PM to Randys
|
Big J
Purple fan
Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 6083
|
|
Reply | Quote
|
|
Re: Re:
quote:
Witchy Nightmare wrote:
As most of those comparisons, it's not so simple as the question suggests. Songwriting wise and in the studio, the Beatles were far superior to the Stones for me, but in terms of live performances, the Stones were.
I saw the Stones live about 30 years ago and what struck me was how good Charlie Watts and Bill Wyman were. They were as good a rhythm section as I have ever seen.
--- Video clips from various gigs -> http://youtube.com/weissheim |
|
6/12/2019, 22:13
|
Link to this post
Send Email to Big J
Send PM to Big J
|
