Runboard.com
Слава Україні!
Community logo


runboard.com       Sign up (learn about it) | Sign in (lost password?)

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 

 
mtb7 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 03-2013
Posts: 864
Reply | Quote
Re: Who owns the name and who has the power in Deep Purple?


Let me clarify one thing, particularly after reading Concrete God's comment: one thing is to perform on a record, another to write the songs. There are two distinct levels of royalties in the music industry, one regarding who actually played on each song, and another related to who wrote the song. Let me make an obvious case: when DP covered the Beatles, JL did add his special touches and Ian Paice did show his unique style, still the song remained credited on DP's album only to Lennon/McCartney. Likewise, just think of the session guys who play on tons of records; if they received writing credits for interpreting a song in their unique way, the very same uinque way that got them the job, they would be the richest people on Earth - yet, they do not, of course.

Having said that, what is confusing to many is that DP shared writing credits equally from 68 to 76, and some assume that therefore all contributed equally. It is not like that, to the point that one of the conditions that Ritchie set when re-uniting in 84, was that members should only get writing credits for the songs they actually helped to write - and on Perfect Strangers, by pure coincidence, the tracks where Lord and Paice appear are a grand total of 2. Why did they initially split 5-way? Because it would have meant that the writers in the band would have been paid twice the money of the non-writers, and it would have created a lot of arguments between band members who were, at the time, roughly on equal terms in terms of popularity. At the time of the reunion, this had all changed and neither JL nor IP had the power to keep that anymore.
Now, if we accept that 3 people wrote the bulk of it, then, given their roles, it is safe to assume that Ritchie's role was dominant in the music, Ian's in the lyrics and vocal melodies and Roger helped both out and refined ideas.

This is how I see it.

quote:

leelyt wrote:

quote:

Concrete god wrote:

quote:

leelyt wrote:

quote:

VleeMouse wrote:


The songs were credited to, not written by.



This is important to remember. The fact that all MK II songs from IR to WDWTWA were credited to B,G,G,L,P it does not mean that they were written by them.



So you mean Blackmore wrote the lyrics..? And that Glover didn't come up with riffs and ideas to Speed King and Smoke just to mention a few?
That Lord didn't have this special touch in the music that made it .. deep purple?
That Paice don't have his own unique sound to make him The Purple drummer?
That really it was a one man show..?



But who on earth said any of the above? The vast majority of the songs in MK II were written by Blackmore, Gillan and Glover, a fact recognised in many interviews by JL.
Where have I ever said that DP was a one man show?





Last edited by mtb7, 9/8/2018, 11:41
9/8/2018, 11:22 Link to this post Send Email to mtb7   Send PM to mtb7 Blog
 
leelyt Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 04-2017
Posts: 795
Reply | Quote
Re: Who owns the name and who has the power in Deep Purple?


quote:

mtb7 wrote:

Let me clarify one thing, particularly after reading Concrete God's comment: one thing is to perform on a record, another to write the songs. There are two distinct levels of royalties in the music industry, one regarding who actually played on each song, and another related to who wrote the song. Let me make an obvious case: when DP covered the Beatles, JL did add his special touches and Ian Paice did show his unique style, still the song remained credited on DP's album only to Lennon/McCartney. Likewise, just think of the session guys who play on tons of records; if they received writing credits for interpreting a song in their unique way, the very same uinque way that got them the job, they would be the richest people on Earth - yet, they do not, of course.

Having said that, what is confusing to many is that DP shared writing credits equally from 68 to 76, and some assume that therefore all contributed equally. It is not like that, to the point that one of the conditions that Ritchie set when re-uniting in 84, was that members should only get writing credits for the songs they actually helped to write - and on Perfect Strangers, by pure coincidence, the tracks where Lord and Paice appear are a grand total of 2. Why did they initially split 5-way? Because it would have meant that the writers in the band would have been paid twice the money of the non-writers, and it would have created a lot of arguments between band members who were, at the time, roughly on equal terms in terms of popularity. At the time of the reunion, this had all changed and neither JL nor IP had the power to keep that anymore.
Now, if we accept that 3 people wrote the bulk of it, then, given their roles, it is safe to assume that Ritchie's role was dominant in the music, Ian's in the lyrics and vocal melodies and Roger helped both out and refined ideas.

This is how I see it.

quote:

leelyt wrote:

quote:

Concrete god wrote:

quote:

leelyt wrote:

quote:

VleeMouse wrote:


The songs were credited to, not written by.



This is important to remember. The fact that all MK II songs from IR to WDWTWA were credited to B,G,G,L,P it does not mean that they were written by them.



So you mean Blackmore wrote the lyrics..? And that Glover didn't come up with riffs and ideas to Speed King and Smoke just to mention a few?
That Lord didn't have this special touch in the music that made it .. deep purple?
That Paice don't have his own unique sound to make him The Purple drummer?
That really it was a one man show..?



But who on earth said any of the above? The vast majority of the songs in MK II were written by Blackmore, Gillan and Glover, a fact recognised in many interviews by JL.
Where have I ever said that DP was a one man show?






Clearly so. JL cannot be given writing credit for sounding like JL. And the same with IP, he can only sound like IP on the drums because that is who he is.
To claim that they were in any part responsible for writing a song because they played on it is not correct.
It was my understanding also that the lyrics were shared between IG and RG.
9/8/2018, 12:09 Link to this post Send Email to leelyt   Send PM to leelyt Blog
 
MadridPurple Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 07-2018
Posts: 74
Reply | Quote
Re: Who owns the name and who has the power in Deep Purple?


Do we know who really wrote which songs in the Mark 2 era? I often read that Maybe I'm a Leo was mainly written by Glover.
9/8/2018, 12:13 Link to this post Send Email to MadridPurple   Send PM to MadridPurple Blog
 
mtb7 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 03-2013
Posts: 864
Reply | Quote
Re:


It would be nice to compile something; all we go by are a) anecdotal evidence from interviews, and b) assumptions based on the style of each member (we've seen them all in their solo careers as well, and there are, musically, some patterns that repeat themselves, like for example the four-note chromatic run that pops up a number of times in Ritchie's compositions when it comes to bridging from one song section to the next). But, as far as I know, no single source.
9/8/2018, 12:35 Link to this post Send Email to mtb7   Send PM to mtb7 Blog
 
purpletemple Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 8972
Reply | Quote
Re: Who owns the name and who has the power in Deep Purple?


quote:

leelyt wrote:

quote:

mtb7 wrote:

Let me clarify one thing, particularly after reading Concrete God's comment: one thing is to perform on a record, another to write the songs. There are two distinct levels of royalties in the music industry, one regarding who actually played on each song, and another related to who wrote the song. Let me make an obvious case: when DP covered the Beatles, JL did add his special touches and Ian Paice did show his unique style, still the song remained credited on DP's album only to Lennon/McCartney. Likewise, just think of the session guys who play on tons of records; if they received writing credits for interpreting a song in their unique way, the very same uinque way that got them the job, they would be the richest people on Earth - yet, they do not, of course.

Having said that, what is confusing to many is that DP shared writing credits equally from 68 to 76, and some assume that therefore all contributed equally. It is not like that, to the point that one of the conditions that Ritchie set when re-uniting in 84, was that members should only get writing credits for the songs they actually helped to write - and on Perfect Strangers, by pure coincidence, the tracks where Lord and Paice appear are a grand total of 2. Why did they initially split 5-way? Because it would have meant that the writers in the band would have been paid twice the money of the non-writers, and it would have created a lot of arguments between band members who were, at the time, roughly on equal terms in terms of popularity. At the time of the reunion, this had all changed and neither JL nor IP had the power to keep that anymore.
Now, if we accept that 3 people wrote the bulk of it, then, given their roles, it is safe to assume that Ritchie's role was dominant in the music, Ian's in the lyrics and vocal melodies and Roger helped both out and refined ideas.

This is how I see it.

quote:

leelyt wrote:

quote:

Concrete god wrote:

quote:

leelyt wrote:

quote:

VleeMouse wrote:


The songs were credited to, not written by.



This is important to remember. The fact that all MK II songs from IR to WDWTWA were credited to B,G,G,L,P it does not mean that they were written by them.



So you mean Blackmore wrote the lyrics..? And that Glover didn't come up with riffs and ideas to Speed King and Smoke just to mention a few?
That Lord didn't have this special touch in the music that made it .. deep purple?
That Paice don't have his own unique sound to make him The Purple drummer?
That really it was a one man show..?



But who on earth said any of the above? The vast majority of the songs in MK II were written by Blackmore, Gillan and Glover, a fact recognised in many interviews by JL.
Where have I ever said that DP was a one man show?






Clearly so. JL cannot be given writing credit for sounding like JL. And the same with IP, he can only sound like IP on the drums because that is who he is.
To claim that they were in any part responsible for writing a song because they played on it is not correct.
It was my understanding also that the lyrics were shared between IG and RG.



I disagree. The five of them were together in a room working/ building/ writing the songs. The main idea might have come from one or the other, but they were all involved in the writing process.

It's not like one member went into his own studio and composed the song from a to z and then present it to the group (like Pete Townshend would do).

It was often taken from jams involving most/all members.Therefor it think it's right that all 5 were credited as writers.



---
"Did you know you have hairs up your nostrils?"
9/8/2018, 12:39 Link to this post Send Email to purpletemple   Send PM to purpletemple
 
mtb7 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 03-2013
Posts: 864
Reply | Quote
Re:


Hi purpletemple - I tend to think that there were varying degrees of involvement; when Jon said in an interview about the songwriting process for Perfect Strangers (the album) that he had come with ideas, but in the end they chose Ritchie's ones because they were better, well, I think it's clear where the credits should be. This does not mean that no contributions were made from the others, but there were clearly people driving the process and others running alongside. Even JL and IP themselves agreed on this...
9/8/2018, 13:09 Link to this post Send Email to mtb7   Send PM to mtb7 Blog
 
Friedhelm Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 09-2003
Posts: 469
Reply | Quote
Re: Who owns the name and who has the power in Deep Purple?


I think, that Roger Glover had a main role in the writing process. He mimself said, that he composed a lot of "In Rock". And it must have had a reason, why Blackmore recruited him for Rainbow to be more succesful.
9/8/2018, 13:17 Link to this post Send Email to Friedhelm   Send PM to Friedhelm
 
mtb7 Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 03-2013
Posts: 864
Reply | Quote
Re:


Roger is a fantastic jack of all trades - he contributes to writing music as well as lyrics, produces, arranges, and has a negligible portion of ego...he was instrumental in DP's and Rainbow's success, even if he was not the most prominent member.
9/8/2018, 13:20 Link to this post Send Email to mtb7   Send PM to mtb7 Blog
 
VleeMouse Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 12-2015
Posts: 159
Reply | Quote
Re: Who owns the name and who has the power in Deep Purple?



The idea that DP songs seemed to naturally evolve from jam sessions and so all were involved is a bit misleading. It needs a riff. it needs a hook. Just remember Man On The Silver Mountain could (and should) have been a DP song.
9/8/2018, 14:13 Link to this post Send Email to VleeMouse   Send PM to VleeMouse Blog
 
leelyt Profile
Live feed
Blog
Friends
Miscellaneous info

Purple fan

Registered: 04-2017
Posts: 795
Reply | Quote
Re: Who owns the name and who has the power in Deep Purple?


Just writing songs from jams has lead to the music that DP create now, where every song just sounds like part of a jam.
9/8/2018, 14:21 Link to this post Send Email to leelyt   Send PM to leelyt Blog
 


Reply

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7 





You are not logged in (login)